The Disillusionment of Tap-to-Earn: A Year Wasted for Mere Cents
PR
  • Bitzo
  • Published 5 hours ago on June 25, 2025
  • 3 Min Read

The Disillusionment of Tap-to-Earn: A Year Wasted for Mere Cents

Table of Contents

  1. The High Hopes Set by Blum
  2. Unveiling the Realities of User Experience
  3. The Disappointing Payoff After Persistent Effort
  4. Exploring the Flaws in Execution
  5. Lackluster Tokenomics
  6. Absence of Real Utility
  7. Contrasting with a Promising Alternative: XYZVerse
  8. Community and Market Reception
  9. Concluding Insights

Engagement gamification in the crypto world has seen platforms like Blum promising easy earnings. However, reality has often fallen short of these promises, leaving users disillusioned.

The High Hopes Set by Blum

Blum, a platform developed as a Telegram mini-app, enticed millions with the prospect of merging decentralized finance with gaming. Tasks like tapping and catching virtual objects, blended with the excitement of crypto, suggested significant earnings ahead.

Unveiling the Realities of User Experience

The journey with Blum was fraught with delays and goalpost changes. From an initial TGE scheduled for late 2024, it was repeatedly postponed, leaving users persistently tapping, hoping for a fruitful outcome.

Further complicating matters, Blum implemented stringent eligibility criteria for its airdrop, requiring users to meet several challenging conditions:

  • Minimum Blum Points accumulation,
  • Necessary Meme Points or activity verification, and
  • Referrals.

The Disappointing Payoff After Persistent Effort

Finally, in June 2025, the TGE took place, but the rewards were starkly underwhelming, with many loyal users receiving as little as 10 $BLUM tokens. The disappointment was palpable, as shown by an overwhelming response on their primary communication channel, an announcement on Telegram.

With BLUM's low market value, the tokens distributed didn't even amount to substantial pocket change, resulting in widespread frustration among the participants.

Exploring the Flaws in Execution

The mismatch between user expectations and reality stemmed from overly optimistic marketing compared to the actual economic model of the platform. The key issues identified were:

Lackluster Tokenomics

The token supply and its distribution mechanics were never transparent, resulting in significant dilution of value as user numbers grew.

Absence of Real Utility

Despite the gamification, Blum lacked engaging activities like staking or a marketplace, which could have sustained user interest and platform value.

Contrasting with a Promising Alternative: XYZVerse

In contrast to Blum's downfall, XYZVerse is gaining recognition for its solid structure and clear utility in the meme coin market.

XYZVerse distinguishes itself with definitive tokenomics, where significant tokens are burned at each presale phase, and robust partnerships providing real-world utility for its tokens.

Community engagement and ongoing updates maintain user interest and trust, a stark contrast to the opaqueness seen in Blum's operations.

Community and Market Reception

The crypto community's reaction to XYZVerse has been notably positive, as illustrated by discussions on platforms like Reddit where users highlight its potential compared to other meme coins.

Community Feedback on XYZVerse

Concluding Insights

The tap-to-earn model, exemplified by Blum, illustrates the importance of clarity, utility, and realistic expectations in crypto projects. XYZVerse appears to learn from past mistakes, presenting a viable option for those seeking genuine opportunities in the meme coin market.

For further information, visit the official XYZVerse website or join their community on Telegram and X.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as financial advice.

Investment Disclaimer

Share With Others